Friday, December 12, 2008

Thank goodness for some common sense

You'll notice the new SpaceOasis poll to the right of these posts. One of the things that has baffled me over recent weeks is this split in thinking between saving the economy & saving the environment. The debates have always been about one or the other - how can we kick-start the economy? How can we reduce carbon emissions? Governments have talked about investing in capital projects, preventing runaway unemployment, reducing our reliance on foreign oil. In the next interview, they talk about the need to cut emissions, improve energy efficiency, become self reliant.

Yet I've only just found the magic key I've been looking for - someone to link the two and say why don't we kick-start the economy (domestic & global) by doing exactly those things that we need to do to prevent the impacts from climate change irreversably damaging our future.


According to the New York Times, "President-elect Barack Obama is arguing that there is no better time than the present to invest heavily in clean energy technologies. Such investment, he says, would confront the threat of unchecked warming, reduce the country’s dependence on foreign oil and help revive the American economy."


The UK government is proposing capital projects such as road building, but why would this be a good idea when we already know that more roads mean more cars and that more cars mean more emissions, regardless of how fuel-efficient the car is. George Monbiot, in his book Heat, argues for major investment in public transport, especially coaches and trains, as a way to reduce transport emissions. Why don't these two desires marry up - invest heavily in public transport and other "green" initiatives, and kickstart the economy at the same time?


I found the NYT article through the BBC news website via a US-based organisation, the Pew Charitable Trusts. Reading through their website, I get a comforting feeling that despite all the gloom & doom and the naysayers, there are some pretty heavyweight people on our side.

Thursday, December 11, 2008

There's charity and there's charity...

Walking in to work this morning was a bus-stop advert for a supermarket's charity Christmas cards. Not wishing to gripe or anything but from their 50p box of charity cards, only 10% went to the charity.


Card Aid, the not-for-profit organisation gives 100% of its profits to the charities involved. Indeed, their website also links to the Charities Advisory Trusts annual Scrooge Awards that "awards" the companies with the meanest donation from their "charity" cards.


So remember, if you're still looking to buy your Christmas cards this year, not all charity cards are equal.

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Only 48 hours to save Europe’s new climate policy

Act Now on the EU climate bill, says Christian Aid

Dear supporter,We've only 48 hours to save Europe’s new climate policy.

France, Germany, Italy and Poland, urged on by industry lobbying, are drawing back on commitments for a strong EU response to the climate crisis. This threatens to undermine Europe’s resolve to play its full part in next year’s vital Copenhagen summit.
It is crucial we urge their governments not to break this vital deal. Help us save the deal –
email their ambassadors now!.


For more information, go to http://www.christian-aid.org/

Monday, December 08, 2008

New poll

The latest SpaceOasis poll goes live today, debating the relative value of the ongoing efforts to save the economy from financial meltdown versus the ongoing debate about the environment. The poll runs until the end of December, so vote now!

Monday, December 01, 2008

Downs and ups

It’s been a while since my last post, due in part to other commitments. However, I have to admit, I felt a bit despondent after reading the last couple of posts at monbiot.com. I’ve read his stuff for quite a while, and was always impressed by the optimism and can-do attitude but the last couple really quite scared me. The first was the blackest projection I’ve yet seen that it’s actually pretty much too late to do anything now. The second was the opportunities missed in the recent Climate Change bill. Faced with such a bleak projection, it's difficult to see where to go.
However, it’s important to take a range of views, and there’s great value in reading the no-holds-barred worst case scenarios. It can fire you up, make you angry, make you determined for change. And it’s also important to see the good around you.

And I’ve been inspired by a couple of things this week.

The first is the website of the East Anglian Food Link – a not-for-profit organisation promoting resilient food production. The thing I like about the site is the fact that it doesn’t start by highlighting a big problem and then revealing the magic bullet solution. Instead it states “The problems are relatively clear, the solutions more tentative” and provides evidence, discussion and debate. I was interested to learn that the evidence they have gathered does not support the notion that the answer is simply local food, and also that the Real Bread Campaign was launched a week or so ago on 26th November. I was amazed to find that, despite living in a medium-sized city, there are only two places near me that bake “real bread” (based on being made of only four basic ingredients, and without the use of improvers). The campaign’s website is, like that of the EAFL, engaging and clear.

The second source of inspiration is, of all things, soil… I’d been reading National Geographic’s September 2008 issue, all about where food comes from (no prizes for guessing it’s the soil!). But the thing that interested me most was the discussion around terra preta, the dark soil created in the Amazon thousands of years ago by indigenous peoples enriching the soil with charcoal. Not only does it create a microbial environment that improves crop yields, but, also locks away vast quantities of carbon. I’d already read an overview of this process in the book “What about China?”, so was really delighted to find that tantalising mention expanded upon in Nat Geo. While many in the developed world are looking for high tech solutions (seeding oceans, space mirrors etc), it’s a wonderful thought that a solution to global warming could be simple, centuries old, and under our feet all the time.




Thursday, November 20, 2008

Bringing it home

As regular readers know, I'm particularly susceptible to issues affecting children, and here's one that particularly hit home - check out Picture 6:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/7730357.stm

The picture comes from the BBC's excellent analysis of the situation in the DRC, and highlights the appeal launched today by the Disasters Emergency Committee to help people in the Congo (http://www.dec.org.uk/).

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

The appliance of common sense

A piece by The Guardian’s Simon Jenkins prompted an interesting debate on the subject of the so-called “War on Drugs” (an earlier variation on the seemingly endless “War on Terror”). The particular trigger was the assertion that “In the south (of Afghanistan) the British have no strategy except to re-enact the Zulu wars at exorbitant cost in money and lives. The Helmand campaign is magnificent but mad.” Simon Jenkins was talking about the wars in Afghanistan & Iraq, rather than the war on drugs, but our view, as non-experts, was that a solution to one war (on drugs) could be an, admittedly partial, solution to another (in Afghanistan). Without degrees in development economics, international politics or the history of US drug policy, we came up with two workable strategies:

1. Instead of bombing opium fields (specifically in Afghanistan), buy the opium and use it for legitimate medical purposes. The farmers would have a steady income, don’t feel punished by the government (or the West for that matter), and are not drawn into criminal activity by the “drug lords”. A recent article, also in the Guardian, lamented the shortage of opium for medical purposes at the same time that piles of it were being burnt up in Afghanistan.
2. Instead of bombing coca fields (in Central America), encourage the farmer to grow coffee, bananas, whatever, and pay a – and here’s the key part – fair price for those products. Growing coca / manufacturing cocaine will then seem less attractive, not least because growing coffee doesn’t normally come with the built in risk of being bombed by various air forces.

There we are; two people with nothing but a bit of common sense, with a plan with a clear outcome that is better than the one we currently have (an endless “war” with no clear achievable end). So, to paraphrase Simon Jenkins, how come “London's finest minds joined with those of Washington” cannot consider such a plan and make it happen?

If anyone can see a fundamental flaw in this reasoning, I’d be delighted to hear it. Sure, it won’t be easy, it won’t be done in a day, but it’s got to be better than what we have now.

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Some changes to SpaceOasis

Blogging seems to be one of those things that just never stand still! Some great new functionality for SpaceOasis courtesy of those nice people at blogger.com:
  • An opinion poll - this month's poll is on peacekeepers in the DRC - let us know what you think
  • A bookstore - all the recommended books reviewed on SpaceOasis can be found at the SpaceOasis "astore" from amazon.co.uk
  • An RSS Feed - you can now subscribe to SpaceOasis wherever you happen to be
All this sparkling new functionality can be found in one of the boxes to the right.

Let us know what you think.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

And then there were two...

And update from the Control Arms website brings news of an important victory in the fight for an international Arms Trade Treaty.  This treaty aims to ensure tougher arms controls - the UN treaty aims "to control the unregulated international arms trade, which fuels conflict, poverty and serious human rights abuses around the world".

On Friday 31st October, the UN voted overwhelmingly to move forward with work on the Arms Trade Treaty.

Only two countries voted against it - the US and Zimbabwe.  It's amazing to think that America and Zimbabwe should choose to become isolated together on this issue.  Let's hope that the new President of the USA and the infant, and fragile, power-sharing government in Zimbabwe together take the opportunity for their new governments to do something right for themselves and the rest of the world, and reconsider their votes.

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

"Big" news, "small" news

It's been a tumultuous week, and today is the day of the American elections - what happens today will shape the history of the world for the next few years. In a sense, that's obvious - one could argue that what anyone does today could shape the history of the world - history, the present & the future belong to us all. However, given the recent history of the USA and the hopes riding on both candidates, there's arguably a feeling that we are at a crossroads. And only time will tell.

The events in the Democratic Republic of Congo (there's a title surely sorely inaccurate) have shocked everyone, and as a parent, the coverage has been heartbreaking. A number of charities are active in the area, including Save the Children, Christian Aid and Oxfam. And no doubt a host of others.

But there's a frightening view, raised by the BBC on TV and radio that we are all implicated in the war - the BBC News at Ten suggested that if people have bought a mobile phone (the components inside) or gold in the last few months, it could have come out of the conflict zone. The BBC website points out that Rwanda has been accused of being behind the current crisis, but also hosts a link to Global Witness, an organisation dedicated to "breaking the links between natural resources, conflict and corruption". This idea was put to David Miliband, the UK Foreign Secretary on the Today programme on 3rd November, following a UN report of corporate "profiteering" (my words), however, to my mind, he refused to be drawn on the subject, instead talking about the importance of a political and economic settlement in the region.

And, finally, in many ways, the story that broke my heart the most, that of the thirteen year old girl in Somalia, who, according to Amnesty International, as reported by the BBC, was stoned for alleged adultery.

Many stories, many ways to get involved.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Paying off the Debt II

Following my recent post paying off the debt, I was interested to see the BBC News Science pages run a similar piece - Earth on course for eco 'crunch'. I was mentioning this to some people the other day and their view was "why do I care about the possible eco-crunch tomorrow when the financial credit crunch is affecting me today?"

It's always difficult to think about other people when your own welfare is threatened, but I can't help thinking that the more we view ourselves as all tied in to this world together, that if one loses, we all lose, the better things will be.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

The little things that make the world of difference

It's often the aggregate of little things that really make the difference - you only have to think of an avalanche to get that idea. So if you're looking for somewhere to start, how about any one of the 500-plus suggestions in this book:




Or, move from "pale green" to "dark green" with one of the many suggestions here:





Either way, you'll be making a small step to a better future for everyone.

Newton’s Third Law?

It’s a funny thing when you are reminded that for every person with a strong belief or opinion, there’s someone with an equal and opposite opinion.

Had some interesting conversations last week about the role of the armed forces, and reasons for joining. The people I was talking to asserted that they had joined up to “defend Queen and Country”. We had an interesting debate around who exactly our armed forces are defending Q&C from, which I guess is basically around semantics, but let's say that between us we had "equal and opposite" views!

However, it reminded me of something the monks used to say at school, which was that there were only three useful and worthwhile careers for someone to have – teacher, doctor or farmer (teaching, healing & feeding). While this view is somewhat restrictive, and certainly, in this analysis, my own chosen career would have nothing to offer (!), I wonder whether there is a fourth worthwhile career – defending those who cannot defend themselves. This could redefine the role of our armies, navies & air forces (the UN, Nato, Peacekeepers & national forces alike) to provide that security for people who are deprived it, whether from outside aggressors or from their own corrupt or unlawful governments.

With no agenda other than defence of those people, it would seem that there are a number of candidate countries for such an intervention. After which, the teachers, doctors and farmers can be allowed to do what they do best – teaching, healing and feeding.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Paying off the debt

The recent study by Deutsche Bank (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity – aka TEEB) argues that the cost of the current financial crisis is miniscule compared to the annual cost of the environmental destruction we are doing to the rainforests. The study analysed all the “services” that the forests deliver by being there (carbon capture, water filtration etc) and looking at the costs of losing those services, or providing them ourselves by other means. The study estimates the costs in lost “natural capital” as being between $2 and $5 trillion per annum, compared to $1 to $1.5 for the current financial losses on Wall Street.

Both the BBC and George Monbiot report and comment on this study.

One thing that strikes me is a conceptual link between this study and the reports over the last year on personal debt in the UK. When times were good, we spent and spent and spent until levels of debt soared out of control. There are probably lots of people now wondering how they can pay back the interest on their debts, before they can even start to think about paying off the capital.

In the same way, by taking resources out of the natural world, we are borrowing against this natural capital, with no concept of how we’re going to pay it back. At some point, in the same way we’re seeing now with the economic crisis, that capital is going to run out. And if that happens, it’s difficult to see what environmental “bank” or “government” is going to jump in and magically supply a fix to sort it all out. And even if we could get round it, the “interest” will be the cost of clearing up the mess we’ve already made.

Translate all the lessons we’re currently learning from the disintegration of our deregulated and frankly free-wheeling economy into the various challenges that our attitude towards our environment pose and you have a fairly stark view of a possible future for all of us. Yet as with debt, the earlier we can reduce our borrowing, the less painful will be the payback in capital and interest. The quicker we start tackling the environmental issues highlighted in the report, we more able we will be to make long-term small steps to save ourselves, instead of the big, painful shock moves that will be the inevitable outcome.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Debt Week Website

Hmm. Looks like the http://www.debtweek.org/ is unavailable (unless it's just me?). So instead, here's my "Spotlight On..." debt, with thanks to the Jubilee Debt Campaign, whose website makes great sense of a tangled subject.

What is the key message?
The kind of debt we're dealing with here is debt held by countries in the developing world, where there is either no chance of the country ever being able to repay it, or where to do so is impossible without sending its people into a spiral of poverty.

Isn't that their problem, not ours?
It would be if the debt was part of a fair process, but most of the debt in question either has impossible conditions attached (such as unfairly high interest rates), was provided illegitimately (such as to dictators to buy arms to oppress their own people) or removes the ability of the debtor country to support its own people.

So who's making a fuss about this?
Lots of people - there are campaigns all over the world to get this debt cancelled, but often as the first step towards a fairer and more equitable world for all of us, rich and poor, in the developing or the developed world. Third World debt is seen as a touchstone issue by many - as a clear and visible illustration for the way in which we treat each other in ways that are often unfair. Any internet search will throw up many organisations dedicated to this work. Or see some of the other posts on this blog.

http://www.jubileedebtcampaign.org.uk/ is, in my opinion, the best place to start.

Friday, October 10, 2008

Microcredit from the Cooperative Bank

The Cooperative Bank, already a leader in ethical banking "...has created a special $50 million fund in order to support the future development of small businesses in some of the world's poorest countries. " Their blog is here. Microfinance is a real breath of fresh air after all the news recently of banks & finance organisations whose operations are so huge that they defy the imagination.

The Big Ask

This is really good fun, a great idea, and an effective way of making your concerns known about climate change. It's also incredibly important timing, given that yesterday, the UK government signed off the first part of the Stansted Airport expansion. Making the Climate Change bill, the first of its kind in the world, include carbon emissions from shipping and aviation may just be enough to revise the wisdom of airport expansion in the UK.

http://www.thebigask.com/

177,095 people (at time of writing) have signed up. Why not join us.

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

Nothing new under the sun

I wrote on 23rd September about the concept that climate change could be a form of wake-up call for us all, and that in seeking to address an issue that affects rich & poor alike, we could build a more equitable world for us all. That in effect, climate change could be "good" for the developing world.

So, I was rather pleased to see an article on the BBC news website asking the same question in the context of animal species facing extinction. They come to similar conclusions - that the wake-up call occasioned by climate change could actually result in the kinds of action necessary to save many of the world's most endangered species.

One of the consequences of the current global economic crisis (credit crunch, financial melt-down etc) is the aparent loss of interest in "environmental issues". According to various surveys, these issues have been relegated behind the availability of mortgages, house prices and fuel price rises. The profligacy of unregulated borrowing and bankers' bonuses has lead many to call for, or claim to be seeing, the end of the Age of Irresponsibility, or the Age of Greed.

Yet, scarily enough, I'm now old enough to have seen this before! In 1990, at the end of the 80's boom years and facing the prospect of slowdown, the (now defunct) Today newspaper ran a seemingly endless series of articles & Op Ed pieces on this very subject. The "greed is good" era was over - kindness, responsibility, the emergence of the "new man", and an increased interest in the environment would be the hallmarks of the new age. Yet, nearly 20 years later, the same opinions are being espoused all over again. It seems that we have very short memories, and we are happy to allow our collective lives to run rampant when things are "good", yet have a colleactive mea culpa cleansing when things are starting to look bad.

If we are really going to enter a new "Age of Responsibility" or "Age of Generosity", whatever those words mean to the various pundits, we are going to need to commit ourselves to actively remember what happened before, and turn our self-conscious and confessional desire to make ourselves anew into real action. That is going to take the kind of discipline we have allowed ourselves to become unused to.

Friday, October 03, 2008

Carbon Calculator

I've been reading "What about China?", a book with lots of answers debunking the common myths & misconceptions about climate change. It's also got a handy index with lots of websites.

I tried http://www.carboncalculator.com/ to see what kind of footprint I have (the UK average is 12 tonnes a year according to the book, 9.8 tonnes according to the website). I came out at 7.646 tonnes, which I guess is pretty good until you think about the average worldwide carbon footprint of 4 tonnes and the target of 2 tonnes! It actually puts in perspective all the kinds of things that we do to try and be green, yet I'm still nearly double the world average & nearly four times the target! Even taking into account that the calculator isn't perfect, we've still got a long long way to go.

Read the book, visit the site and see for yourself.

Thursday, October 02, 2008

Well done Sainsburys!

I don't often get to go supermarket shopping nowadays, but did pop into Sainsburys the other day for some bananas. I was most impressed by the range of fair trade products on sale. Most of the tea, coffee etc was FT, as was all of Sainsbury's own brand sugar. Rice, chocolate, biscuits; a whole range of stuff. I was pretty impressed - no-one's completely there yet, but so far, so good.

Monday, September 29, 2008

Passionate reading

I’ve been reading George Monbiot’s The Age of Consent, which (and I’m only on Chapter 3) calls for the setting up of a world parliament. It’s a funny thing as it reminded me, reading through it last night, of when dad used to tell us stories when we were kids. These stories seemed ahead of their time – one I remember well was based on the concept of a world parliament. So it’s funny, how this idea has lain dormant in my mind for all these years, only to come out again when reading The Age of Consent.

I consider myself generally optimistic about humankind, that generally people want peace, want justice and have a sense of fairness that goes beyond the narrow boundaries of what’s “best for me”. Yet, I have to say that his book disturbed me by forcing me to confront beliefs about “other people” that I didn’t know I had.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

NSPCC Campaigning Newsletter

Now that I'm a parent, campaigns aimed at protecting children take on an altogether different perspective, so I've followed a few campaigns organised by the NSPCC. Just got an email with their campaigns update:

http://www.nspcc.org.uk/getinvolved/campaign/aboutcampaigning/facingforwardnewsletter/Facing_forward_front_wda59564.html

Could Climate Change be a great opportunity for the Developing World?

On the face of it, climate change looks like it will disproportionately affect the developing world more than the rich northern countries. Predictions are that vast areas of Bangladesh will be subjected to even more severe, or even permanent, flooding. More of Africa will become desert, and, in one of the predictions I was most surprised by, the Amazon basin will become savannah. Each of these, set alongside hotter summers in southern Europe, and milder, drier winters in England, seem to suggest that the developing world will suffer more than we will, through increased poverty, competition for water and farmland, and local environmental issues.

So it’s an odd premise that climate change could be looked at as an opportunity. Yet, climate change, “the defining issue of our age” as various pundits have called it, could be the first event that will unequivocally affect every single person on the planet. Hotter summers, wetter winters and the reduction in food-growing capability around the world, as well as rising sea levels, will affect us all, rich or poor, north or south. Wherever we are, if the climate change predictions come true, we will have to adapt and this will affect our economies, our politics, our lives in every way. If everyone is affected, then everyone has a stake in solving the problem.

Perhaps I’m being overly optimistic, in the face of all historical evidence, but this could be our opportunity to come together and devise not just a solution to climate change, but to all the other issues that are intrinsically linked – the issues of local environmental degradation, crushing poverty, unfair trade rules & deregulation. In the same way that climate change will affect us all, regardless of national boundaries or income bracket, so the solutions will benefit us all. We can, in essence, use climate change to build that better world.

Friday, September 19, 2008

Buying the Rainforest

Seems there is an Early Day Motion 893 to look at this proposal from the president of Guyana to set aside 80% of his country's rainforest as a carbon sink. Controversial, intruiging, but definitely a step in the right direction. Until the money-value of living rainforest is greater than the value of its logs, gold seams etc, we will continue to cut them down.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7603695.stm

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

An interesting comment on the BBC

There was an interesting article on the BBC the other day about reform of the various environmental agencies:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7592899.stm

Even more interesting was one of the comments posted by a reader, who stated:

The world is full of "do-gooders" who have a vision of a "perfect sustainable unchanging fair-to-all world". All they need is everybody else's money to do it. "No thanks!"

Interesting, is that presumably he preferred a vision of a world that was inherently unfair & unsustainable?

Pale Blue Dot

This sent to me from one of the guys at work with a picture of a bunch of stars and a pale blue spot:

The picture was taken by Voyager 1 in 1990, at his suggestion engineers turned the craft around for one last look at Earth when it was 4 billion miles away. At the moment it is about 10 billion miles away, before you read the extract think about that - 10 billion miles, coupled with the extract below it really made me think!

"Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there--on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds.
Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.
The Earth is the only world known so far to harbour life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.
There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known."


Turns out it's on Wikipedia (what isn't?) from Carl Sagan, the astronomer and author. I like this as it pretty much summed up the reasons why I called this blog SpaceOasis. If the universe really is a desert, then this pale blue dot is a tiny oasis in that vastness.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

The master at work

I mentioned George Monbiot's blog page in a previous post - got my first mail today, and was hooked. Here's a guy who writes as brilliantly in a short article as he does in his books. I was really bowled over, and (as per last week's post on his archive) now really interested in older varieties of fruit trees! You'll have to take a look to get what I'm talking about:

http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2008/09/02/strange-fruit/

I'd mentioned the list at the back of Heat for organisations committed to combatting climate change:
www.foe.co.uk
www.greenpeace.org.uk
www.wwf.org.uk

were the obvious choices, but also liked:
www.transport2000.org.uk

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

Complete Muppet

Being a complete muppet, I still haven't sorted out making a will. It's the single most important thing on my list of things to do, but keeps getting put off. So a poster in the Help the Aged shop prompted me to go to (and sign up with) willaid.org. For a suggested donation this November, a qualified solicitor will draw up your will and the money will go to one of a number of charities you can choose from a list of participating charities. Since 1988, the scheme has raised over £7m for good causes.

Friday, September 05, 2008

Looks like the government's coming in for a pounding today over its refusal to provide some sort of one-off payment to cover the rise in fuel costs for the most needy people - Hilary Benn, the Environment Secretary argued for improvements in energy saving measures such as insulation etc rather than a one-off payment or a windfall tax on energy companies. But surely this is just avoiding the root cause of the issue - namely that we cannot guarantee energy security in the current climate (economic, political &, hey, why not climate change too), that a deregulated energy market cannot prevent speculation, and that energy companies may not always be working in the public interest, despite what their PR says. Until we tackle those things, energy is always going to be a social issue.

On a more cheery note, Planet Earth interviewed a chap called Johan Eliasch, a businessman who "put his money where his mouth is" and bought a huge chunk of rainforest from a logging company to prevent its destruction. Lo and behold, I wikipedia it and come across http://www.coolearth.org/. What a great idea - and it provides jobs for local people at the same time. And even James Lovelock approves!

Thursday, September 04, 2008

Debt Week 2008

Again, from the Jubilee Debt Campaign's email - I did this one last night (though I've got a funny feeling I've mailed him before!)

Pick up the pace in Debt Week 2008
From 12-19 October 2008 it will be the second Global Week of Action Against Debt and the International Financial Institutions. In the UK we’re using the opportunity to keep up the pressure on the UK government to Pick Up the Pace on debt cancellation.
With lots of grand talk expected at upcoming summits about tackling poverty, we need to make the case that more debt cancellation is urgently needed if countries are going to be able to emerge from the poverty trap. TAKE ACTION: Email Douglas Alexander, International Development Minister, and ask him to drop much more debt.

50 crucial days

From the Jubilee Debt Campaign:

Today is the first of 50 Global Days of Action Against Poverty and Inequality, taking place in more than 100 countries around the world. After several years of drifting and inaction, the rich world has a series of opportunities in the coming months to take serious action to tackle global poverty - and we have to make sure they take them.

Make aid work and drop the debt
Rich country governments are gathering in Accra, Ghana, from tomorrow for a summit to discuss the effectiveness of aid. Jubilee Debt Campaign supports the global aid campaign’s efforts to ensure that new, concrete targets and indicators come out of this summit for rich countries to deliver on their aid promises. But we have also joined our voices with other movements and civil society organisations to warn that unless unpayable poor country debts are cancelled, it will be very difficult for aid to work effectively.
Click here to read more.

Ethical Superstore

When I used to travel to York quite a bit with work, there was a supermarket where I'd buy lunch on the way to the office; can't remember the name of it, but everything in it was "ethical" in various ways. They used to do amazing Tamil Curry pasties! Sadly, the store closed down, but when I saw ethicalsuperstore.com advertised, I was pretty impressed. They don't sell Tamil Curry pasties, but they do sell a whole range of stuff - I particularly liked their eco-toaster! Our toaster's still going strong, but as soon as it packs up, you know where I'll be heading. They also sell in bulk - I'm waiting for them to start selling huge boxes of ecover dishwasher tablets (they sell a lot of ecover in bulk, but not those!) and then I'll be converted.

Heat

No! Not Heat, that crappy magazine about celebrities (sorry, I just have a thing about celebrity mags and probably celebrities in general!), but the book by George Monbiot. Finished it on the train going up north this week - I think he succeeded in his mission - I was stirred, impressed and deeply worried all at once by his book. Monbiot argues that targets set by governments are not really workable in that they're based on targets that won't achieve what they're set out to achieve. Add to that, the fact that despite what people say, they (we?) don't actually want our governments & representatives to push too hard on these aggressive climate targets.

Despite this, his views seem both incredibly reasonable, and also would bring about the kind of world (at least in Britain) that must be a step forward for the one we have now. His chapters on integrated transport policy and energy policy actually make you excited to think what could be possible if we just put our minds to it.

Heat? Get a copy and see what you think.

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

Getting in the way

I’m sitting here in the dark, in a hotel room (travelling for work), having just watched the last episode of Planet Earth on my work laptop. My brain is buzzing a bit with all of the things I’ve been reading, watching and thinking over the last few days and weeks. I’m sitting in the dark, partly because the video is brighter with all the lights off, but also because here in the room there must be about eight lights that come on automatically when I walk in the room and put my electronic key card in the slot just inside the front door. Add to that the fact that the TV is always “on”, on standby mode, 24 hours a day and you’ve already got a pretty big footprint. Luckily, there is a (slightly platiscated) feedback card so I’m going to suggest they do something about that.

Planet Earth has been a pretty amazing series – I bought it with my Christmas money (!) and it’s taken me just over eight months to watch it all. It’s been exhilarating, yes, really, and also depressing. Sad that so much wildlife and wilderness is being destroyed all over the world, and it’s still difficult to see what we can do about it. I think one of the difficulties is that individuals are well-meaning but distracted by a lot of the day to day things we have to do – jobs, families, etc. (Big) businesses on the other hand, have people whose jobs it is to undertake activities that, sometimes by definition, conflict with what some of us consider important (the environment, justice, fairness etc). One of the chaps being interviewed in this last episode was a something-of sustainable agriculture for a large drug & hygiene products company. He suggested that part of his remit was to promote a balance between sustainability & production (in this case, of palm oil). I just don’t buy it. If you work for a business, you’re in the game to make money. The other things are only a by-product. If doing things sustainably is compatible with making money, that’s great; but if it’s not, then that’s the end of it, they will only ever do what’s going to make money, create profit & satisfy shareholders.

So, certainly the last few weeks has seen one step in the right direction for me – I’ve finally ditched my “evil” old bank and transferred all my dealings to the UK’s foremost ethical bank, the Cooperative Bank. They have a strong ethical policy and I can sleep soundly (when small daughters permit!) knowing that my money isn’t going into funding arms dealers and tin pot dictators around the world. My previous bank responded positively to accusations that they were supporting the remnants of Zimbabwe’s government, in defiance of the views of the rest of the world, and quickly shut off the money. But I wanted a bank that didn’t need to do that, that didn’t try to push the envelope of what they could get away with – I wanted one that had a moral and ethical stance built in. I’m only annoyed that I didn’t do it earlier. I’ve known for years and years that my bank was particularly “unethical” but never got round to switching. I think that’s one of the big things that prevents us doing the “right thing” – it’s not that we consciously choose wrong, it’s that other things get in the way.

Greyhounds

I’ve been reading Heat by George Monbiot – the book that defies you to read it and not to want to make a change. In fact, in the conclusion he tells the reader to return the book & ask for a refund if it doesn’t make you want to make a difference. Well, it did, though perhaps he was preaching to the converted. There were a number of areas where I was really impressed, notably about the conservation of energy in the home (some real areas for me to think about there) and also about the public transport system, which I’ve long been frustrated by, particularly with it being cheaper (and arguably more pleasant) to drive somewhere in the car, compared to public transport. However, public transport, always the preserve of the desperately poor (esp in the USA, where the Greyhound was an entertaining insight into the impoverished classes and the mentally unstable drifters of the west coast, but one I wouldn’t want to spend too much time indulging in) is really the way forward, so something I really want to push on. There was a (surprisingly small) section at the back of the book, of organisations committed to tackling climate change, so I’ll have to look further in to it. The one area where Monbiot claims to fail is air transport, and I have to say this is a difficult area, even for us, who take one short-haul flight per year, to see the relatives in Ireland. Having tried once by car & ferry, when Daughter Number 1 was very small, I’m in no hurry to do it again. The ferry part was wonderful – the cabin was comfortable and really quite elegant, but the car journey, with a less-than-one year old who screamed from leaving the house at six o’clock in the evening, and only stopped when we rolled down the ramp into the ferry some six hours later, just in time to unload her from the car into the cabin – was a nightmare. I suspect the only way to do it, especially now with two littlies, would be to either hire a bigger car (or buy one if our current car dies a death soon!) or go by the dreaded public transport. With the amount of stuff we have to cart around for two weeks with the rellies is anything to go by, it’ll be a while before I’m brave enough to do that.

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Control the International Arms Trade

There's a new website, formed from a coalition of Amnesty International, iansa & Oxfam, aimed at controlling the international arms trade. Here is their first email:

Every year, millions of people suffer as a result of the irresponsible arms trade.
Two years ago, 153 governments voted at the United Nations to start work on developing an international Arms Trade Treaty. We want as many people as possible to take action to control the arms trade.

Play "Catch the Bomb" and spread the word

Throughout 2008, a group of experts from 28 countries has been meeting to discuss the content of the treaty. Now is the time to turn words into action and deliver an Arms Trade Treaty strong enough to save lives and stop irresponsible arms deals.
A small minority of governments opposes international controls on the arms trade and is determined to block, derail and delay any further progress on the treaty. They must not be allowed to succeed.

Tell your government that the world is watching, it’s time for an Arms Trade Treaty

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Ending Child Poverty

There are 3.8 million children in the UK living in poverty and the NSPCC is committed to supporting the End Child Poverty alliance along with over 100 other groups such as Oxfam, NCH and Save the Children.

If you would like to read more about their “Keep the Promise” campaign you can visit their website.

Peacekeepers for Darfur?

From Oxfam's campaign email on helping people in Darfur.

http://www.oxfam.org.uk/get_involved/campaign/actions/darfur_peacekeepers.html?ito=2440&itc=0

Caption: A makeshift classroom in one of the many camps in Darfur and neighboring Chad. Credit: Brigitte Lacombe

UN Peacekeepers in Darfur, Sudan, are struggling to do their job – because scarcely one-third of the promised force has been deployed. The people deserve better. Hear about life on the inside of Darfur’s many refugee camps through the voices of those who live there. And make sure you call on Gordon Brown to deliver what’s been promised.

For more information on Oxfam's work, follow this link: Life in Darfur

All mums should have access to decent maternal care

Sounds like a no-brainer to me, so followed Oxfam's suggestion and mailed Gordon Brown:

http://www.oxfam.org.uk/get_involved/campaign/actions/maternal_emergency.html

In pictures: All mums should have access to decent maternal care. Watch Oxfam's photo slideshow and find out how some poor countries have managed to turn their health systems around.
http://www.oxfam.org.uk/get_involved/campaign/health_and_education/maternal_mortality_slideshow.html

Monday, August 18, 2008

Can a bar of soap change the world?

Probably not in itself, though I guess enough of it would certainly make the world a cleaner place.

However, the question has a serious point. We were staying with some relatives over the summer and while in the shower, I couldn’t help noticing how many plastic bottles there were on the bathroom shelf, probably about 30 bottles of various gels, shampoos, conditioners, de-tanglers etc etc for a fairly small household. All of those bottles (apart from maybe the Body Shop ones) were destined to be thrown away once empty. And I thought, what’s wrong with an old-fashioned bar of soap?

So, one personal, small-scale commitment - no more plastic bottles of shower gel. I’m gonna stick with the humble bar of soap from now on.

And recycle the cardboard box it comes in!

Saturday, August 16, 2008

The barbarians at the gates

As is so often the case, I'm reading about five books at once.  Today's entertainment was Heat by George Monbiot.  In it he asserts that he was once giving a presentation somewhere and was asked what the UK would look like if it cut carbon by 80%.  he didn't have the answer, but a colleague of his did.  The colleague suggested that the UK would look like a poor third world country!  A scary thought.  He goes on to suggest that we are the few generations that lived in luxury (in the west) and that our ancestors & our descendents would not be able to believe the lifestyle we live in (in the same way that, I guess the Anglo-Saxons thought about the Romans who had left the shores of Britain generations before).  However...  Not to be too gloomy (and I'm only there on chapter one) he does claim that if we take his advice on board, we can keep our standard of living and reduce carbon emissions enough to avoid disastrous climate change.  I for one, will carry on reading!

Friday, August 15, 2008

Making a difference

Just after my last post, got a note from my favourite campaign website - pressureworks - to say that it's closing down, but that it's gonna carry on under the Christian Aid "Act Now!" banner. Will have to check that out - my social justice alert mechanism seems to be on overdrive at the moment.

We live in strange and interesting times. With wars in ex-Soviet republics, trouble in Zimbabwe and starvation and poverty all over the world, it sometimes seems that the whole scope of it is beyond us. What can any of us do to change the world? And then it struck me. Everything is a choice. Poverty and injustice isn't just something that happens, out there, beyond us. It's something that we all make an active choice to allow or deny. We, each of us, choose in our daily lives to allow poverty, to allow injustice, to survive and thrive. So, what would be my list of top things that we can each do to make a difference.

  1. Be informed. Ignorance is the greatest breeder of injustice I can think of. So much goes on without our knowledge of consent. Knowing, understanding how the world works is the first step to changing that. Read, listen, look around you.
  2. Act - don't put off making a difference - see what other people are doing and copy it. Strike out on your own and bring people with you.
  3. Write letters and take up campaigns - there are so many websites that help you - try Oxfam, CAFOD, Amnesty International, Save the Children, WWF. Whatever takes your fancy, use that as a starting point. Tell other people what you're doing.
  4. Buy Fair Trade. A little thing that makes an enormous difference. Every time you choose not to (and I'm guilty of doing this) you choose to support unfair trade. By definition, if it isn't fair, it's unfair.
  5. Remember how powerful you are. We are all powerful - we spend money, we invest money, we vote, we have a voice. All of these things can make a tremendous difference.

Friday, August 08, 2008

Friday at last

Today was fairly mad at work, relentless!  Still, could have been worse - the Beijing Olympics began today (8th of the 8th, 2008!) as 8 is a lucky number for the Chinese.  Not so lucky if you happen to live in Georgia (Russia, not Alabama!) as Russia invaded today.  Nightmare; according to the BBC they reckon it'll develop into a full-scale war.  Not what anyone needs right now (except perhaps the various companies supplying arms and possibly post-war services!)  Or am I just getting way too cynical.  I've ordered a couple of books from the library by George Monbiot, who's a famous (originally) anti-globalisation guru, but seems to have got to grips with the global-warming thing - he's apparently a great polemicist, so I'm looking forward to reading that. 

Was watching the Extras disc from Planet Earth yesterday and crikey, it was bleak stuff - all about species extinction.  There was one comment, by, I think James Lovelock (of Gaia fame) who suggested that after one and a half centuries of unrivalled growth, what we actually need is to go backwards!  Actually contract our lifestyles.  There was also quite a bit of discussion about the role of poverty relief - ie that it's no use talking to desperately poor people in the third world about saving species when all they're concerned about, quite rightly, is saving themselves.  Goes back to my idea a while back about the value of providing pensions for people in poor countries so that they didn't have to struggle so desperately as they got older, and also didn't feel they had to have ten kids each (unless I guess they actually wanted ten kids!) in order to support themselves when they couldn't work any more.  Might have to come back to that one sometime.

Oh and possibly the end of the world will come tomorrow as CERN will be turning on the Large Hadron Collider tomorrow sometime!  In theory (well, nutter-theory, apparently) it could create a black hole that will implode the earth and destroy everything in the solar system.  I don't suppose any of us will actually experience it as, should it happen, I guess it'll be instantaneous!  See you tomorrow!

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

Shock Induced Insomnia

Did get quite a lot of reading done and read loads of The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein. It was certainly scary and very exciting too (bizarre for a book that's essentially about economics!) but it really opened my eyes to all the things that had been happening in the world over the last twenty to thirty years. I'd always had this view as a kid that history pretty much ended at the end of the second world war - that after that, there wasn't anything else interesting that happened. Then it turns out that war in itself never really stopped, it's just that the front line shifted. As NK says in the book - this is a new war - one with no specific enemy, no specific place of engagement, and no end in sight. The enemy could be anyone, even me! Anyone that stands in the way of profit. There was actually one point last week where I'd (perhaps foolishly) read before going to bed and I was so wired from the experience that I couldn't sleep until after 1am! It's a long time since that happened

Tuesday, April 01, 2008

Trucks and Carbon Emissions

The European Space Truck made its second test docking today. I'm very much a futurist and feel that this is really important for mankind; especially since reading some really good science fiction recently. I like to think that someday we really will travel to the stars, or at least have the option.

And because I'm also a humanist, I was pleased to get a mail from Christian Aid, following up on a campaign they've been running to ensure that companies report all their carbon emissions. Fairness and transparency ought to be the hallmarks of a decent and civilised society, and this is one small step along the way.

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Couple of other thoughts...

Couple of other things on my mind this evening, first of all, Earth Hour, yesterday, which I totally forgot about (doh!) though probably most of our lights were off anyway. I read some stuff afterwards that suggested that turning everyone's lights off for an hour and then on again, would cause a surge that meant that our generally inefficient generating system (at least in the UK) would actually burn more fuel to cope with the swing, than would otherwise have been burnt. But of course, one way or another, if it highlights to people the impact they can make for good or bad, then that's surely no bad thing.

The other thing is that an environmental group is planning to demonstrate outside work tomorrow. No idea why other than possibly that we (the company) invests its money in lots of carbon-creating businesses. We shall see at approx 08.00 tomorrow!

First Day of Summer

In a recent Nat Geographic (well, recently read) there was an excellent article about the permafrost and the tundra. The writer wrote about how the people who lived there were, and had to be, intimately connected with the landscape as they relied on it, intimately, for survival. He advocated that sense of belonging, of being a part of the landscape, as something that is missing from our modern, transitory lives.

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

Living Simply

Yesterday was Pancake Day and I'd kinda forgotten, given that it was one of those days when you're first in the office and last out. So, having missed out on the pancakes, I was reminded by G that of course you're meant to give something up for Lent.

But it reminded me of the thing with diets is that by focussing on what you're meant to be giving up, you're missing the point that suddenly not eating that mars bar with your eleven am coffee is more likely to make you give up sooner or later as you're just taking the pleasure out of your life.

So rather than giving something up for Lent, I've been inspired by the Live Simply idea, originally found on the Live Simply website, but the concepts isn't restricted to one faith. In fact, if you strip out the whole question of faith, it's still fundamentally about justice and fairnes in our dealings with others.

Which is a lot more positive than just giving up chocolate for a few weeks.

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

Timing is Everything

On Sunday, we went out and bought low energy lightbulbs, enough to replace all the existing standard bulbs that came with our new house. All good stuff.

Next day, what did I see? This news item on the BBC News site warning of the dangers of low energy light bulbs! It would be great if we could have one answer so that we knew what we did was really going to make a difference, not just shift the problem from one place to another.

In the meantime, I'll keep the low energy bulbs. If nothing else, I should wind up with lower electricity bills.

Sunday, January 06, 2008

Pressies

Amazing! According to the Motley Fool (www.fool.co.uk), the average Briton received £90 worth of unwanted Christmas presents this Christmas. This is on top of a figure I heard last year (can't remember where from now) that said the average family in Britain spends £2100 on Christmas, and that by Christmas 2007, most people were still paying off their credit card bills from the previous Christmas. That's a whole lot of pressies.

So, if you did receive £90 worth of unwanted presents, most charity shops would probably be glad of them, especially if they're still in their boxes. Our nearest will be getting a haul fairly shortly.

And Sainsbury's (and no doubt the other major supermarkets) are doing their annual recycling of Christmas cards, with proceeds going to The Woodland Trust. Well done Sainsburys.